Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Omniscience | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono White Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | ignotus97 | 7-2 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | sam_lewin | 7-2 | None |
| Orzhov Tokens | ivan_draw_go | 6-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Omniscience , 5 Color Caves , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Reanimator , Azorius Angels , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras
Meta Performance Analysis
Day of Judgment ranks #337 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 83%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Day of Judgment is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 8.34 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Day of Judgment has a win rate of 70.9%, making it 4.8% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 27 | 78.7% | 13 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 27 | 76.8% | 11 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 37 | 73.8% | 13 |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 15 | 70.8% | 4 |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 6 | 69.5% | 3 |
| Elspeth, Storm Slayer | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 28 | 68.5% | 8 |
| Abrade | Instant | 31 | 66.8% | 11 |
| High Noon | Enchantment | 17 | 65.7% | 6 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 8 | 65.2% | 2 |
| Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 32 | 62.6% | 11 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Day of Judgment than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 84.2% | 76.2% | +8.0% |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 2 | 27 | 80.5% | 75.5% | +5.0% |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 16 | 78.6% | 73.6% | +5.0% |
| Oracle of Tragedy | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 6 | 76.7% | 72.1% | +4.6% |
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 47 | 78.2% | 74.1% | +4.1% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 77.8% | 74.2% | +3.5% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 25 | 78.9% | 75.4% | +3.5% |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 5 | 27 | 77.0% | 74.0% | +3.1% |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 3 | 34 | 76.8% | 74.2% | +2.6% |
| Lightning Helix | Instant | 2 | 30 | 76.1% | 73.6% | +2.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 851 | 64.9% | 47.2% |
| Azorius Control | 337 | 88.7% | 50.9% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 111 | 31.4% | 51.0% |
| Mono White Tokens | 79 | 13.0% | 40.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 60 | 16.5% | 37.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.